Inside Sales Experts

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Interviewing Inside Sales Reps: 5 Rules

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 @ 09:31 AM
Digg digg it | Reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | StumbleUpon StumbleUpon 
We recently posted an article on Sales Interview Preparation: Candidate Side.  Now I would like to talk about the other side of the coin and offer "5 Rules" for interviewing Inside Sales candidates.

Making a hiring mistake is extremely costly. Consider:

  • Dollars in terms of recruitment expense
  • Lost revenue in uncovered territories
  • Demotivation for rest of the team

We have to get better at identifying the key skills for our teams and then evaluating candidates against those skills.  Here are some rules of thumb:

  1. Always do your first interview over the phone. You don't care what the person looks like but you do care about their ability to clearly articulate their thought process. Focus on their use of proper grammar, their ability to think on their feet and their speech patterns.

  2. Hire someone who has the experience to sell what you sell. This is true even when you are hiring Inside Reps to do pipeline development. If you sell a service, hire someone who has sold a service before. If you sell a $150K solution, hire someone who has sold an enterprise solution before. Don't make the mistake of thinking "they are young and eager, they will figure it out." They will eventually but in the meantime you are not going to get the productivity you need to make your numbers.

  3. Have a well defined interview process. If you are going to have the candidate interview with multiple people, have a process for collecting feedback. Create a feedback sheet that details the key skills you are looking for and have each interviewee rate the candidate on a scale of 1 to 4. This will take emotion out of the equation and give you a rating system to compare each candidate you interview against others.

  4. Ask the candidate to send you an email recapping their impressions of the interview process. The objective here is twofold. First, you may uncover some information about them or your own process that you were unaware of. Second, you get to evaluate their writing skills. This is so important! Bad grammar and punctuation are okay when text messaging but not when you are trying to communicate your value proposition!

  5. Ask to see last year's W2. Did you ever get a resume that did not say the candidate was 110% of quota? The whole world is 110% of quota! You know what their target income was at their last job so seeing the W2 gives you a chance to determine if in fact they did over achieve. If it does not substantiate that fact, then you have a bigger issue - one of honesty. PS - If you are uncomfortable asking for the document ask your recruiter or HR person to do it for you.

We hope you find this information useful.  Please feel free to post other ideas you have on identifying "A" players!

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

#5 is interesting. Does that mean then that I as an interviewee should ask to see your W-2 before letting you see mine? I mean, if the hiring manager is supposed to be top notch and the opportunity is supposed to be great, then shouldn't he or she also be making big bucks on bonus? How many employers do you feel would be willing to that open; especially if they are overstating the opportunity.

posted @ Thursday, August 21, 2008 6:31 PM by Jerry Edwards


Actually, it doesn't matter. If you are an applicant applying for a job that you desire...why would you care? If you were being honest, your W2 should back up every claim you made on your resume. 
 
Yes,#5 is interesting....and the reason it is interesting is exactly because of the reaction it invoked. One would hope that during the interview process the candidate would ask equally compelling questions that would address some of the potential issues you outlined.  
 
Perhaps that is fodder for another post?

posted @ Thursday, August 21, 2008 8:23 PM by trish bertuzzi


Great rules. My personal favorites are #1 and #5. HR was always trying to get me to meet the candidates while I wanted that first and even second interview to be phone-based. If they can't sell me on why I want to bring them in, they're not going to sell my service, either. #5 always gets people up in arms. It's such a un-PC thing to do. Resumes can be faked, references can be from "friends pretending to be bosses" instead of real bosses so other than unsolicited references, checking W2's is the only way to trust-but-verify.

posted @ Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:02 PM by Michael Kreppein


Asking candidates to bring their sales pipeline, critical ratios and calendar to the first interview causes reality to be exposed too. Ask, "what was your best month?" Ask "what drove sales that month?" Look at the critical ratios, as in length of sale cycle, and then go to the calendar and find correlation between the activity from several months prior to the month they claimed all that revenue. Did you find the activity?

posted @ Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:27 PM by Dave Kurlan


To @Jerry 's point. Is it fair for a candidate to ask for YTD Quota attainment numbers for the team? As a candidate, don't I want to make sure the hiring manager isn't "overstating" the productivity of the team as a whole? Thoughts?

posted @ Friday, August 22, 2008 9:30 AM by Matt


I was told by a recruiting agency in California that requesting a copy of a W2 violated CA state employment law and could be viewed as disriminatory.  
 
 
 
It should be easier to hire qualified inside sales people in 2008, than ever before. With collaboration technology now part of the mainstream selling process, it is much easier to attract quality sales people to touch more prospects and get involved in more deals (increasing gross profit per transaction) 
 
 
 
Is inside sales being redifined in the 21st century (may be a good blog article :-))

posted @ Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1:38 PM by Dan Tyre


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.