Inside Sales Experts

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Signal v. Noise In LinkedIn Groups

Posted by Matt Bertuzzi on Thu, Jul 15, 2010 @ 03:25 PM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 
Tags: 

Note: this post is different than what we usually write about here. It is about the Inside Sales Community (the good, the bad & the ugly). I hope you’ll stick around to hear me out.
------

As many of you know, we founded and manage the Inside Sales Experts group on LinkedIn (5K+ members – thank you very much). Trish’s vision when starting the group was to create a space where:

  • Inside Sales practitioners could share ideas and information
    -and also to-
  • Allow professionals from a variety of industries to network with people with similar interests

We have worked hard over the last 2 years to make the group a success and remain true to those 2 objectives.

Recently LinkedIn rolled out a major change to how groups are operated. In short, I and quite a few others think this new look sucks. Well not the “look” but how Groups now handle “Discussion” and “News”.

 
What does this mean?

With this change comes a combining of "News" and "Discussions". This has had the effect of burying Discussions, in my opinion, the heart of LinkedIn Groups, among the “News” posts (see image at right)

By "Discussions" I mean: 
- Questions asked by group members to other group members in the hopes of gaining/sharing information 

"News" on the other hand includes: 
- Solicitations 
- Webinar invites 
- Blog links 
- Other self-promotional material 

 
What we are doing about it?

We launched a poll to our group members asking for their input.

As of this writing, 78% expressed the opinion that we should Keep "Discussions" 100% free of "News" (solicitations, webinar invites, blog links, etc.).

One commenter, Mark Wiertsema, wrote

Inside sales experts is the best group I'm subscribing to. By far. Single reason is the good moderation, discussions that provide actual value and active contributions. Just as important for the quality: absence of (covert) ads, job postings, etc.

There are hundreds of lists where we can advertise, post openings, scream about useless innovations. Let's do that there, and keep inside sales expert the best group on LI.

We are in the process of gathering more feedback and determining the best course of action to stay true to the spirit of our group’s founding.

 
Why should you care?

Well, for 2 reasons.

  • First, LinkedIn groups are a truly amazing way to learn, and more importantly, to help our peers.
  • LinkedIn’s really isn’t at fault here. We are. LinkedIn isn’t flooding our groups with webinar invites, self-promotional news & links to articles about/for/by us. We are.

Yes, we are all in Sales & Marketing. And yes, we are supposed to market & sell. But not at the expense of learning from and helping one another. So the next time you or I or anyone wants to post to a LinkedIn group, we should ask ourselves:

Is this signal? Or is this noise?

Am I trying to foster to a discussion here? Or am I shouting down someone else’s discussion in the spirit of self-promotion?

Thanks for listening and please, please let me know what you think about the Discussion/News topic.  Better yet, let LinkedIn know.


----------
UPDATE
: Chris Herbert wrote a post called What was Linkedin Thinking? Check out his commentary and some excellent screenshots that prove the point.

1 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Inside Reps Should be Using LinkedIn Company Follow

Posted by Matt Bertuzzi on Fri, May 07, 2010 @ 07:22 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 


Last week LinkedIn rolled out a new feature: “Follow Company”. My initial reaction was that this would just add to the information clutter problems that we’re all facing.

After a week of limited use, I can say my first impression was dead wrong. This tool should be added to the Inside Sales arsenal today.
 

What it does

LinkedIn describes the feature as follows:

Starting today, you can be in the loop on new developments, potential business opportunities or even job opportunities by following companies of interest to you

Here is how my LinkedIn homepage looked this morning (you can see 2 examples of companies I’ve chosen to follow).

 
What it gives Reps

On this blog and in conversation with clients, we stress the importance of trigger events and delivering timely, relevant & compelling messaging in outbound prospecting efforts.

“Follow Company” gives your Reps a stream of potentially relevant trigger events that use changes in the buyer’s environment to potentially engage in conversation. For example:

  • Departures and/or new hires in target roles
  • New job opening in target departments
  • Internal role changes that might spur re-engagement

Now, I’m sensitive to the difficult balancing act between crafting buyer-centric messaging and establishing & meeting Inside Sales productivity goals.

The reason for my bullishness on this tool is that it’s native to LinkedIn and doesn’t add to the growing list of applications & sites that are involved in pre-call planning. 

 
Who it's best for

There are some limitations to which types of organizations can or should be followed. Follow Company works best for:

  • Companies that are large enough to have formal LinkedIn Company profiles
    I've found 3 person shops that have claimed their profiles and much larger organizations that have not.

  • Companies that aren't so large as to inundate you with information
    Netflix, for example, had 1 role change, 8 job postings & 4 employee departures all within the last 7 days.
     

But what do you think? How do we walk the fine line between preparation and activity?
Can this tool be useful in your Reps’ prospecting efforts?

Also, here’s a great write-up on the how to use Follow Company. Thanks for listening

10 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Social Inbound 2.0 - Buzz or Buzzkill?

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Thu, Jan 21, 2010 @ 07:08 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

I had the pleasure recently of doing an interview with Chad Levitt for his New Sales Economy Blog.  We discuss a range of topics: changes to the sales profession, inbound marketing, Sales 2.0 & the "arrival" of Inside Sales.

A big thanks to Chad for the opportunity!

-----

Chad: The term Sales 2.0 is getting a lot of buzz and attention - what is the buzz is all about and why is it important?

Trish: The buzz is all about the buzz....every once in a while the next great thing comes along and right now the next great thing is Sales 2.0. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm a Sales 2.0 advocate but when you peel away all the layers, 2.0 is nothing more than the effective integration of people, process and technology.

Smart leaders have been thinking about this integration process for quite some time. What I like about the Sales 2.0 movement is that now it forces people to focus on the buyer as part of that equation. The challenge for sales and marketing executives has become "How do I effectively incorporate the needs of my buyer into my people, process and technology equation?"
 

Chad: I've spoken with many sales reps who think Sales 2.0 and social media are a waste of time - what is your response to them?

Trish: This is a tough one because I see both sides of the equation. If a business has not articulated a well thought out strategy then it says to the Sales Rep "Here, here's a bunch of other stuff that you need to think about and add to your to do list."

Let me break my answer into two segments starting with social media.

  1. We believe, and we presented our thoughts on the topic at the Sales 2.0 Conference in Boston, that it is the responsibility of the corporation to figure out their social media strategy. Social media will deliver an ROI if and only if your buyer is participating in the medium. See our presentation Fishing Where Your Buyers Swim. You can tweet, Facebook. blog and text your ass off but if no one is listening...what does it get you? Figure out where your buyers go for information and then put all your eggs in only those social media basket/s.

  2. As for Sales 2.0, for most organizations it means adding more technology to the mix. Before you do that, it is always good to ask "Have I maximized the technology I already have in place?" And, before you run out and buy the next bright shiny toy, have you thought through the process that will make you successful with it?
     

Chad: I believe inbound marketing can help sales reps create more value for their customers and prospects - how do you see inbound marketing influencing the sales profession?

Trish: Inbound marketing has come such a long way in the past two years. We are a Hubspot customer as well as a raving fans - so we have come a long way with inbound marketing ourselves. Smart Marketers really understand that the difference between dumping lists into a CRM and calling them "leads" and getting people who fit your Buyer Persona to raise their hands and engage with you is the key to success.

Great sales people have figured out how to marry the activity they get via inbound marketing with a well constructed outbound process. If your pipeline isn't robust, you can't sit and wait for buyers to self select. You need to go to them with a relevant story, arouse curiosity and then launch your sales process.
 

Chad: At The Bridge Group you track many different data points and trends - what are some of the most interesting trends you are seeing and what does it mean for sales professionals?

Trish: We have been around for 12 years and I have been in technology based inside sales for 30 so I can now say "Inside Sales is the wave of the future - finally!" We spent a lot of years building a business case for this mode of selling and sometimes it felt like the market would never see beyond "telemarketing". That has changed now and even the venture capital firms are requiring a sound Inside Sales strategy from their portfolio companies. Sales professionals must know how to leverage phone and web based selling to be successful in this day and age.
 

Chad: I read a lot of blogs on many subjects - what are some of your favorite blogs and why?

Trish: I read about 30 blogs a day so I will give you my top 3 - it goes without saying that yours is one as well!

Marketing Interactions by Ardath Albee - She is the queen of all things content driven and I learn a lot from her.

Castain's Sales Playbook by Paul Castain - Paul is not in the technology space but I love to read his stuff because he is incredibly motivating person and gives off incredibly positive vibes.

Garth's World by Garth Moulton - Garth is irreverent and I love that. If it is in his head he puts it out there and I laugh out loud every time I read him.
 

Chad: How do you use social media at The Bridge Group and what kind of results have you seen?

Trish: We blog quite a bit and that drives a ton of traffic to our web site. We just closed one of our biggest deals ever and the company found us via our blog. I tweet and although I do not think my buyers are following me, it has certainly brought me fantastic relationships with vendors, analysts and other consultants.

Look, you can't put a price on having a great network and that is what social media brings you. It isn't about the activity it is about the relationships you develop as a result of that activity.
 

Chad: What is the one thing you recommend sales reps do or learn to stay competitive in an increasingly competitive marketplace?

Trish: Learn how to be relevant to your buyers. The days of vanilla selling are gone. You need to have an intimate knowledge of your buyer's day to day business life. If you make that kind of investment in learning, you will win!
 

The Impact of Sales 2.0 Tool Report
Learn more about adoption, effectiveness & impact of Sales 2.0 tools for B2B Sales & Marketing groups.

Based on surveys of over 90 B2B companies.

1 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Are Marketers Becoming Enablers?

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Tue, Jan 05, 2010 @ 07:28 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 
 
This fall, I had the pleasure of attending Silverpop's B2B University in Boston. At the event, I shared a table with Linda Duchin the VP of Marketing from PowerSteering Software.

During breaks, Linda & I began a conversation about how the line between Sales and Marketing is starting to blur and what some of the implications of that may be.

PowerSteering provides Enterprise SaaS Project and Portfolio Management software to help large organizations manage IT, New Product Development, Six Sigma and other strategic initiatives. They were recently recognized by Forrester Research as a leader in IT and Business-Driven PPM.

I followed up with a call to Linda and here's a summary of the first part of our conversation:

------

Linda, I'm starting to be concerned about the view that Marketing is responsible for a prospect until they are scored as "sales ready".  My take is that it is a slippery slope that could result in lost deals.  If a prospect is in my nurture process and my competitor is fully engaged in their sales process, I think I am at a distinct disadvantage.

Now, don't get me wrong, I think it is fantastic that Marketing wants to assume more responsibility, but as a salesperson shouldn't I be the one to determine when a lead is "sales ready"?  As a salesperson, my job is to convert interest to opportunity.  Why delay that process?

Linda: Trish, I share your concern!  In fact, I think we're already at the point where some sales organizations feel they no longer have to do outbound prospecting.  Their skills in this area are starting to become rusty because they are not used to it.
 

So where do you draw the line?  What's your vision for a best practice and how does it work within your Sales organization?

Linda: Internally, we don't use the terms sales ready or marketing ready.  It just adds a level of complexity to the process that we don't need.  We agreed on basic qualification parameters and we adhere to those. And when necessary, we revisit those qualification criteria.

Our internal group handles most of the leads we generate, but we do assign the customer leads directly to the Sales Reps.  We sell to large global organizations so new contacts within those organizations represent potential expansion value to us.  Our Sales Reps maintains the relationship with our customer, so it makes sense for them to leverage that knowledge to penetrate new groups, divisions etc.

We also send them leads for companies where they are already engaged in a sales cycle to ensure continuity of follow up  We want the Sales Rep to have immediate access to any contact that may impact the ongoing sales process.  It also eliminates the potential for Inside Sales to be calling into an existing opportunity.

Our goal is to have one point of contact for every Account at the relationship level and we try to facilitate this through marketing automation tools like Salesforce.com and Marketo.
 

At this event, and throughout the industry, there is much discussion about Sales and Marketing working together to build out lead definitions, scoring and nurture programs.  Conceptually, most companies are in agreement with this strategy.  What have you seen in terms of implementation?

Linda: Well, that is a bone of contention with me!  You never want Sales and Marketing to be silos, but when push comes to shove, there is only so much time in the day for collaboration.  At some point you have to draw a line in the sand and move forward with a strategy which of course can and should evolve through ongoing feedback.  The pundits preach nirvana, but you have to make sure that this doesn't come at the cost of sales and end up becoming a distraction from selling.  Practically speaking, it's already challenging just to get basic sales follow up data documented adequately.

The reality is that in the current environment, it's harder to sell than ever before.  That is what has created a lot of this backlash with Marketing owning more of the process.  As Marketers, we are trying to lighten the load for Sales.  We are trying to give them the bandwidth they need to focus on closing business in the current quarter.

------

We will publish the rest of the interview next week.  My question to you is: What do you think? 

Is Marketing being forced to assume too much of the sales process?  Are pipelines at risk because our Sales people are waiting for perfection as opposed to getting out there and converting interest to opportunity?

Are "sales ready" leads the bullet that moves us forward or shoots us in the foot?

13 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Sales 2.0 Tools Report: Impact on Sales & Marketing Effectiveness

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Thu, Dec 10, 2009 @ 07:57 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 


There is much buzz around the Sales 2.0 movement and many different definitions afloat.  Our definition is that Sales 2.0 is the effective convergence of people, process and technology.  Regardless of the variations in verbiage, what remains consistent in is the impact technology can have on the buying and selling process.

So, to take a look at this issue, we surveyed 97 Sales & Marketing Directors, VPs and C-Level Executives on the Impact of Sales 2.0 Tools within their organizations.

We focused on tools/services in four core areas:

  • CRM
  • Sales & prospect data sources
  • Lead tracking & marketing automation
  • Sales enablement & productivity
     

Adoption Rates

We thought the most interesting way to present adoption rates would be to overlay the data to the technology adoption lifecycle (as made famous by Geoffrey Moore's Crossing the Chasm).

These levels of adoption are interesting. Based on the data, all four categories have crossed Moore's chasm.  Executive leadership in B2B companies would do well to consider how these tools can be used to automate, scale and repeat solid underlying Sales and Marketing processes.
 

Deployment Rates

We've also broken out deployment rate data by company revenue size. You can download a the Sales 2.0 Tools Deployment Matrix with no registration required. To highlight a few interesting points:

  • CRM is at 100% deployment across all company sizes
     
  • Sales/prospect data averages 73% deployment with minimal variation across company sizes
     
  • Lead tracking & marketing automation averages 53% deployment, but what is interesting to note is that the $50M-$499M category reported only 48% deployment.
     
  • Sales enablement & productivity averages 30% deployment. Interestingly, only 19% of the under $50M category has deployed. Also, 43% of the $500M+ category have deployed, but with homegrown systems as opposed to vendors.
     

Please note that this report is a snapshot of market perception and is not intended to review or recommend specific solutions. 

We would love to hear from you so.... 

  • If you have metrics to share on how Sales 2.0 tools have increased your productivity and yield PLEASE share a comment.
  • If you are a vendor in any of these categories and you have data to share, PLEASE feel free to post a comment. If you would like to make a special offer to our readers, feel free to send it to me.

Let's get a conversation going! Hope to hear from you!

3 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Do Sales Tools Equal Sales Effectiveness?

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Tue, Aug 25, 2009 @ 07:26 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Steve Harper, is today's guest blogger. He also blogs at plan2win.
----------------------------------------------------

With the explosion of "Sales 2.0" mentions, how do we evaluate the tools that are available?  Which ones will really drive better effectiveness? 

According to CSO Insights, the #1 issue that worries VP Sales and CEOs, behind increasing revenue, is increasing sales effectiveness. 

In a different survey, 97% of CEOs interviewed are planning on increasing revenue this year.  More interestingly, 67% plan on increasing revenue while REDUCING headcount in the sales department. 

Now, I am not a math major, but, if you want to increase sales and decrease sales people, each sales person has to sell more than they were selling.  Right? So increasing the productivity of each sales person has to be the utmost priority.  The real question is exactly HOW do you do that?  Enter Sales 2.0 tools. 

First, let's back up and talk about what Sales 2.0 IS... With all the stuff written, you would think that there is a new Facebook that sells the stuff for you.  The reality is that selling is just as hard (more so) than ever before.  The other reality is that buyers are more informed than ever before, and they EXPECT you to be.  Therefore the first 2 sales calls (introduction, learning about the business, etc.) are gone.  Sales 2.0 is the acceleration and abrupt deceleration of the sales process.  It is also the incredible number of tools and services available.

So what are the tools?  Salesforce.com is the most visible tool that sales teams are now using, but InsideView, Connect and Sell, DemandBase, and Kadient are excellent examples of where sales tools are headed.  The key is having the information that you need, when you need it, in a place that you need it, so you can ACT ON IT!  And this is where things sometimes fall down.

For today, let's start with ConnectAndSell

(Trish here: ConnectAndSell is a combination of switching technology and virtual sales agents that connect Sales Reps to prospects.  They guarantee 5 live connects per hour to each of your Reps and typically average 7-10.)

This is a great tool, technology and service... BUT, for it to work, the team has to be ready and trained to use it. If they just throw up on the individuals that they get on the phone, then all you did was add efficiency to a bad selling experience and process.  You will get more conversations, so by simple math you will get more deals, but you haven't really made the sales process an engine.  So a few things to make this a success:

  1. Have a plan and a VERY TARGETED list.  Without a good target list based on a good sales plan, then this is automated "Spray and Pray"

  2. Have an Excellent 15 second introduction. Get their attention fast and keep the conversation about them, their issues, and their success.

  3. Know what your goal is. 99% of companies are not going to close anything on one call.  You are probably just trying to set up a time to have a more detailed conversation.  Get their attention, generate some interest, set up a time, get off the phone, move to the next one

  4. Stack industries, verticals or product lines. This makes the introduction and the conversation easier for the rep to focus on. If the first call is a bank and the next call is an engineering firm, the mental shift in a few seconds is tough. Make sure that the list is focused every time you use the service.

  5. Turn off your cell phone and forward to voicemail your desk phone. Close your email client. FOCUS on the calls and you will be much better.

These tips should help you increase your effectiveness with ConnectAndSell.  Good Selling!

-----

Trish here again: Steve mentioned that he will be sharing his thoughts on other tools over the next several weeks. I'll be sure to share them when he does.

(Photo by: mixergirl)

7 Comments Click here to read/write comments

New Survey: The Impact of Sales 2.0 Tools

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Fri, Aug 21, 2009 @ 07:24 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 
I am very excited to announce the launch of our Technology's Impact on Sales & Marketing Effectiveness survey. We will be using this data to produce a research report - due to be released by mid-October.

I would like to extend an invitation to participate (in the 4 minute web survey) to Sales and Marketing Leaders.  We will reward your participation with a FREE copy of the report when published. Here are a few requirements for participation:

  • Selling in a B2B environment
  • Survey participants are Director, VP or C-level (Sales or Marketing)

If you are interested, please email Matt at insidesalesreport@bridgegroupinc.com and he will send you the links. 

The report will focus on technologies in the following core areas:

  • CRM tools
  • Sales & prospect data sources
  • Lead tracking & marketing automation
  • Sales enablement & productivity

The topics we will be investigating include:

  • The overall impact of these tools on corporate objectives
  • Perceptions of effectiveness - compared between Marketing and Sales
  • Adoption and usage rates across the organization

I know you will find the information to be of great value.  I am looking forward to having readers of this blog participate so thanks in advance!

(Photo credit: jannem)

1 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Social Networking and Your Business – Part 2

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Tue, Jun 09, 2009 @ 09:51 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 
 
Last week, I outlined 4 approaches businesses can take towards Social Networking. Read Part 1 here. By way of a recap, here is the approach I recommended:

Approach #4 - Aim Before You Fire

You must invest some time and research in understanding your Buyer Personas and how they use Social Networking before you build out your strategy.

Now onto Part 2:

Step 1: Know Thy Buyer Personas

People still confuse their Ideal Customer Profile with their Buyer Personas.  Your Ideal Customer Profile typically looks something like this:

Verticals: Healthcare, Financial Services
Revenue: Over $1B
Role: Anyone with "security" in their title

Ideal Customer Profiles point you in the right direction and make it easy to purchase lists, size target markets, etc. 

Buyer Personas, on the other hand, provide you with the information you need to communicate with your buyers in a way that is meaningful to them.  Think The Bachelor - you need to make a "connection" with your buyers and that connection has to be personal, emotional & relevant.

So, how do you do that?  Well, you start by fleshing out your Buyer Personas to the point that they are people with faces, names, specific challenges & goals.

Let's walk through a high level example which is a representation of Jennifer, a Director of Marketing.

What do we know about Jennifer?

  • We know her background
  • We understand her role and how she is measured
  • We understand the things that frustrate her
  • We know how she defines a "win"
  • We understand her expectations of vendor relationships

If you are like most companies, you will have multiple Buyer Personas and you should execute this exercise for each of them.  It will provide you with the language you need to communicate with these buyers.  They don't want to hear about how wonderful you are. They want to know how you are going to help them solve the challenges they face on a daily basis.
 

Step 2: Find the Jennifer's

Now that you know what Jennifer looks like, you can find sample Jennifer's in your customer and prospect base.

Next, go do some research to find out how they are using Social Networking. It has never been easier to conduct this research: Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook - they all provide search capabilities.

The matrix displayed above is all you need to create your Social Networking strategy.  That matrix will tell you where to invest your time for your specific Buyer Personas.

In this instance, the strategy is clearly laid out for you.  You want to invest significant time on LinkedIn, establish a presence on Facebook and then investigate Twitter to connect with your Jennifers.
 

Step 3: Find the Conversation

So, now we know who to target and we know what networking sites to target.  Next, find the conversations that are meaningful to Jennifer.

We already know our Jennifer's are active in LinkedIn groups so why not start there. Your research on Jennifer's groups will provide you insight into where your Buyer Personas are spending time.

Join those Groups with the goal of engaging in meaningful conversation, not indulging in self promotion. Ask questions, answer questions - establish yourself as a thought leader. This is about sharing information and becoming part of a community with your buyers.
 

Summary

Ready...Aim...Fire is a great approach to Social Networking.  Taking the time to understand your buyer is an investment that will pay off!  It takes some planning (and requires some work), but would you trust any Sales & Marketing strategy that didn't?
 

Agree? Disagree? Please share your thoughts on getting started with Social Networking!

3 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Social Networking and Your Business – Part 1

Posted by Trish Bertuzzi on Thu, Jun 04, 2009 @ 12:02 PM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 


I recently had the pleasure of presenting at the Sales 2.0 Conference in Boston.  I participated in a panel on Social Networking in a Sales 2.0 World. Hmmm....got me thinking.

As Inside Sales experts, we are always interested in new ways to generate leads.  While I concede that Social Networking does not yet have a consistently proven ROI in "hard metrics", I speak from personal experience when I say that it certainly does have a proven ROI in "soft metrics"

I read a quote on Twitter the other day that I'm not going to do justice to, but it read something like this: "If you speak with passion on Twitter, others with a similar passion will hear you."  Makes sense right? 

So, where should you begin?  With so much on all our plates, how do we add in Social Networking and does it even make sense to add it to our daily task lists?  Well, that is what we are going to talk about. 

There are really 4 options for how you pursue a Social Networking strategy for your business and I want to lay them out for you (see presentation below).

The title of my presentation is "Fishing Where Your Buyers Swim."  I chose this title because before you do anything else, you have to understand how, where & why your buyers are using Social Networking.

There are so many social networking sites out there...and this number only continues to grow.  How do you figure out where to invest your energy? 

Possible Approach #1 - Ignore It!
This analysis by Forrester clearly states that ignoring the phenomena is not in your best interest.  Although the data is from 2007/2008 (here is the current research tool), you can see that increasingly B2B technology buyers embracing social media.  This trend is changing the nature of the B2B buyer/seller realtionship at a fundamental level.


Possible Approach #2 - Let Your Reps Figure It Out
This one is a little scary to me.  Your Reps are using Social  Networking in their personal lives and are starting to dabble with it in their professional lives.  But, not having a corporate strategy for how they do so puts you at risk in 2 areas.

First, you have no control over what they are saying about you, your product, your company and/or your competitors.  Are they on message, are they being professional, are they articulate? 

Second, if everyone is off doing their own thing, how do you measure what is working and what isn't?  Defining repeatable, scalable success is the cornerstone of all great strategies.


Possible Approach #3 - Go For It
Build business profiles on Twitter, Linkedin and Facebook and just dive in.  The good news is that it gets you out there.  The bad news is that you are probably going out there with a vanilla strategy that may or may not resonate with your buyers.  You may also be investing time, effort and energy on social networking sites that your buyers don't frequent.  This is an investment that you need to have pay off.


Possible Approach #4- Aim Before You Fire
This is the approach we recommend to our clients.  You want to invest some time in research to understand your buyer personas and how they use social networking before you articulate your strategy. 

You need to fish where your buyers swim!

Next week's Part 2 post will lay the groundwork for how you can use buyer personas to build your Social Networking strategy.  Stay tuned....

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Is Blogging Replacing The Resume? (Reader Poll)

Posted by Debbie Boucher on Tue, Jun 02, 2009 @ 06:36 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 


Via LinkedIn, I recently ran across a post from Ryon Harms entitled, "Your Resume Is Dead. Long Live Your Blog!" I have to admit that as a blogger, this provocative title piqued my interest and I had to immediately click through to his blog.  Which ultimately achieved what he wanted, right?

Ryon argues that we are in the "hyper-competitive job market of The Great Recession" and that:

Finding a job today is about consistently hitting it out of the park. That means taking advantage of opportunities to do what most of your competitors have not. I suggest you start by rethinking your static two-page resume and starting a blog instead.

But what does this mean in the context of getting hired in Sales or Marketing?

Does having a blog compliment a resume or possibly increase the chance of getting a job?  Absolutely!  But I don't believe it can replace your resume.

Here's my take on what a blog does for Sales & Marketing candidates:

  • Gives Insight Into Expertise and Experience
    This is the kind of depth that candidates have been struggling to (while more often than not failing) bring out in the "cover letter".

  • Shows the "Real" Candidate
    A blog gives insight into a candidate's approach, personality and writing style. I cannot stress the importance of the latter enough.

    Increasingly Sales is a writing intensive profession (for marketing this goes without saying). Just think of how much business is conducted via email.

  • Compliments the Resume
    Posting your resume "live" on LinkedIn and then linking your blog postings to your Network Updates provides you with future exposure. Hey, with 40+ Million users, LinkedIn is certainly a powerful way for candidates to rise above a static 2-page resume.

    Blogs can fill in this "picture" even further. Is this candidate passionate about this topic, field, industry, etc.? Can they stick with something (is the blog 6 weeks old, 6 months or 6 years)? How do they handle differing opinions?

I thought it might be interesting for everyone to take part in a quick poll:
How valuable is a Candidate's blog in your hiring decision?

Here are what a few LinkedIn commenters had to say:

"Very timely and relevant, and I agree wholeheartedly. I'm presently considering a stack of resumes for an SEO position. The ones that include blogs or Twitter accounts are very useful b/c I'm able to get a better, bigger picture of the applicant. Blogs and microblogs allow an applicant to shine in a way that a resume cannot"

"As a search veteran and a guy who reads 60-80 resumes a day I can tell you that a blog plays a very small role in the hiring process. Will it play a bigger role as time goes on? Who knows, but for now I look at the resume, cover letter or email, a LinkedIn profile and maybe a Google search to gather information, and all this only AFTER narrowing the field down to a select handful or candidates. Someone's blog might help or it may rule the candidate out depending on what is written To be honest, a bloggers time is MUCH better spent networking with those that can give me a personal referral and recommendations!"

What do you say?

5 Comments Click here to read/write comments

All Posts | Next Page